Superman might look like just an
exciting* film about a superhero, but it’s really a** profound statement about the
environment, feminism and anti-Social-Darwinism hidden within an action film. It
starts by showing us the unfortunate consequences of the hubris of a government
intent on solving its environmental and energy problems with technology. Then,
we quickly move on to the idea that Krypton is the logical conclusion of
eugenics – every child is created to serve a purpose. Superman’s*** mum and dad
then have a natural birth to give him the choice to be different. It’s the
classic ‘we are not biologically determined’ argument (which reinforces the
decent range of relatively strong female characters, including Lois Lane who saves
the day before being saved). The clearest statements are easily missed because
they come towards the end when everyone is getting thrown through walls. One is
when Faora-Ul is about to throw Superman somewhere and she tells him that her
race is superior because it has evolved to the point where they are better
warriors because they (a) are more powerful and able to survive in their
environment; and (b) they have fewer feelings and connections to others (this sounds
like Social Darwinism but, confusingly, not necessarily what Darwin was going
on about). Another is when Zod justifies
his behaviour in terms of being designed with a particular purpose (and the
consequences of achieving his aim are largely irrelevant). Finally, it gives some men something to aspire
to – big muscles and being nice (and, if possible, destroying satellites
designed to spy on him).
*No, it’s not boring.
**Perhaps unintentionally
***I know he isn’t yet Superman
and they refuse to call him that. Symbol of hope my arse.
No comments:
Post a Comment